Archive for the ‘musings’ Category.

I have not died

I finally decided that, after most of the summer not blogging, I would update this poor, neglected blog.

I’ve had a severe case of review burnout. I am reading books, and for the most part they are lovely, but I haven’t felt like I could write cogently about them. I’m going to try to write a bit about some of the things I’m reading in the coming days, although I don’t know if they’ll be proper reviews so much as scattered thoughts, since that’s all I seem to be capable of blogging about.

Anyway, hi to everyone still here. What are you all reading lately that I should check out?

Sunday Ramblings: The Return of the Delinquent blogger

Hi, Internet,

As you can tell by my lack of postings on this blog, I’ve suffered a bit of blogger ennui lately. It’s not that I haven’t been reading, but much of what I’ve been reading isn’t really worth talking about. I even tried writing up a massive post o’ mini reviews, and I just don’t have a lot to say about a lot of the stuff I’ve read lately, especially since a lot of it has been creative nonfiction and humor collections, which I find difficult to review, because you either think the humor/creative exercise works or you don’t, and I haven’t figured out a way to say things about those books in a way that is compelling to read.

That being said, there are a few reviews I want to post, and I hope once I get into a posting habit again, I will do better about keeping up with them.

So I hope I have not lost all my readers. And I hope you all are reading books about which you are enthusiastic!
In less bookish news, my nephew, Logan Charles, was born this morning. I have already been blessed with one niece, who is an adorable four-year-old, but it’s always nice to have another addition to the family. He weighs in at 9 pounds, 3 oz. nd is 20.5 inches long. His Auntie Shannon envisions a promising career as a linebacker already. Baby and mother are still in the hospital, and my brother and mother and niece are going to visit them in New Mexico this week. I would have gone as well, but though I’m sure my nephew is the bestest baby evar, I suspect my college professors might not consider his birth a terribly good excuse for missing a week of class, so instead I will be here, glued to my phone in hopes of news.

Sunday Ramblings: How I Destress and tales as old as time

Happy Sunday, everyone!

Yesterday I did my own personal readathon. All I did was read, something I haven’t allowed myself to do for quite a while, unless we’re talking about reading stuff for class. I figured it was just easier to immerse myself in books than deal with the RL stuff I’m worrying about, which largely involves things I can’t control. Reading provides an escape from those worries. Unfortunately, my impromptu readathon means I haven’t done any of the other things I meant to do Saturday.

One of the things I discovered about my massive TBR pile is that I enjoy certain themes. So on a whim I decided that the first week in March is going to be Beauty and the Beast week over at this blog. I’ll be reviewing several different takes on the Beauty and the Beast story. So far, I’ve got two YA novels and two adult fantasy novels, and I’m hoping to work in a romance with that theme if I can find one I like… which shouldn’t be difficult considering how much I enjoy that trope. In fact, I’d love recommendations from any of y’all!

And now we come to the list of books I’ve finished this week.

  • Courting Disaster by Kathleen O’Reilly: (Review here.)
  • The Mercy Room by Gilles Rozier, translated by Anthea Bell (Review here.)
  • An Abundance of Katherines by John Green: John Green’s books make me happy. I’ve only got one more to read, and then I think I will happily join his legions of adoring fans. I’ll be reviewing this one tomorrow.
  • Nurture-Shock: New Thinking About Children by Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman: I find the process of child development fascinating, and I thought this book presented some interesting ideas, most of which were counterintuitive, but all of which made sense. I’ll review this one on Tuesday.
  • Crazy Beautiful by Lauren Baratz-Logsted: This is the first of my Beauty and the Beast themed books, and I’ll review it next Monday. In brief: I liked it but it had a few flaws that were kind of eyeroll-inducing.

Right now, I’m reading:

  • Empress by Karen Miller: This one I’ll be reading for a while since (1) it’s epic fantasy and (2) I’m validating it for Bookshare. So far I’m really liking it.
  • Fire Drake by Bianca D’arc: This is one of those fantasy romance series that I love despite the fact that it’s not only cheesy as hell but the author’s influences are so obvious as to be transparent. This book has more of a complex plot than some of the others, and it took me longer to get into, but now I’m hooked.
  • The Ask and the Answer by Patrick Ness: I do want to finish this one. I even started it last week, but then I got sick and I decided that a book where the characters spend all their time having their heads screwed with was not my idea of a comfort read. I will probably get back to it sooner rather than later, though, because I’m dying to know what happens to Todd and Viola!

This week I abandoned Bitterwood by James Maxey. I got all the way to chapter 3 this time before the patently obvious symbolism, the cheesy and trite dialogue, and the fact that all of the female characters so far introduced have the depth of cardboard got on my freaking nerves!

I hope the rest of you have an awesome Sunday and a great week!

Sunday Ramblings: cliques, conventions, and books I’m reading

Happy Sunday, everyone! If you have a partner, I hope you’re enjoying your Valentine’s Day. If you, like me, do not, I hope you’re at least going to buy yourself some chocolate.

Sorry for the stream-of-conscious rambling style of this post. I can’t be bothered to write a coherent essay. I’ve been feeling low-grade nausea all day, and I’m really hoping I’m not about to get sick, because that would suck.

Around the blogosphere this week I’ve noticed a few conversations about cliques in blogland. To be honest, I think cliques happen no matter what community you belong to. It’s just how people operate. And I take a pretty zen view of the whole thing. I know I’m small potatoes in blogland, and I’m cool with that. I could probably increase my page ranking, do more contests, etc. if I wanted to. But I don’t really feel the need. And I consider a handful of bloggers and authors to be friends, but I don’t want to make my blog a popularity contest. I don’t have the time in the first place, and in the second, I don’t know what I’d do with minions and fangirls if I had them.

Of course, sometimes those sentiments are a little easier to maintain than at other times. For example, all the talk on the blogosphere about the book blogger convention does depress me. I am a poor college student. I simply can’t afford to go, and even if I did go, while it would be awesome to meet my fellow book bloggers, I’d still have to deal with the fact that I’d be going to New York. By myself. As a blind person. Even the thought makes my introverted soul weep a little. But man, it would be so much fun to get together and talk about books with other people who are as passionate about them as I am! And, since there aren’t many local bloggers in my area–if there are any at all–it’s never going to happen, and that thought does depress me, because I do feel like I’ll always be on the outside looking in.

Anyway, enough about that. I wanted to start keeping better track of what I’m currently reading, more for my own reference than anything else.

Books I need to review:

  • Eye of Heaven by Marjorie Liu

Books I’m currently reading:

  • Fugitive by Cheryl Brooks – I’m a little over halfway through this one, so I’ll probably finish it today I love Brooks’s cheesy futuristic romance series, but this one suffers from plotting that’s all over the place. Also, the sex scenes are increasingly unsexy.
  • Bitterwood by James Maxey: This is a validation for Bookshare. It’s surprisingly good so far, but I’m not far into it.
  • Love by Toni Morrison: I got this from the Library, and I’m not sure whether I’m going to finish it. It has an interesting premise, and God knows I don’t read enough books by and about people of color, but I’m just not in the mood for something so literary.

So that’s my Sunday. How are the rest of you? Read anything awesome lately?

Thoughts on A Wrinkle in Time

Last month, I signed up for Kailana’s Time Quartet readalong. I didn’t even think about the small problem that would present itself when I decided to do this, namely that I have already reviewed it. So I wasn’t really sure what exactly I could say that I haven’t already said about this book when I read it this year. I decided, therefore, that instead of writing a real formal review, I’d just tell you why I reread this book so often.

The main reason, of course, is Meg. I love Meg. I was Meg. I definitely went through a period of feeling like a complete outcast growing up. I knew that I was different from my peers in significant ways, and I know I had my moments of beligerence.

The thing about Meg that struck me then and strikes me now is that she was a geeky child who *did something*. Her mere existance didn’t automatically mean she was destined for greatness, and she wasn’t completed when she discovered Calvin–who is still one of my favorite YA boyfriend characters, BTW. No, Meg had to struggle and she had to endure and she had to come to grips with her faults, and though she wasn’t alone the whole time, she certainly wasn’t propped up either.

Another reason I constantly reread L’Engle is that I get more out of it each time I read. I knew this was a smart book, but I don’t think I realized just how literary it all was, and I think, now that I’m older and, presumably, wiser than I was at, say, eleven when I first read this book, many of its themes make more sense. Love is important, and Meg’s fierce love for Charles Wallace is a foundation of the entire Time Quartet. And, of course, each time I read the book, I understand more of Mrs. Who’s constant quotes.

To that end, one of the criticisms I’ve read about this book was that it’s quite religious. Normally, that’s the kind of thing that would bother me, but I think L’Engle must have been the sort of woman who, though feeling her faith deeply, would have respected that she did not speak for other people. And, really, the themes she writes about transcend religion. L’Engle writes about love, from the romantic to the filial, and how important it is, even when it’s not always easy. I can’t think of a religious tradition that would disagree with that notion.

I’m glad I got a chance to reread this book, and I’m excited to read what the rest of the readalong participants thought. Next month, we move on to A Wind in the Door, which is probably my favorite of the series.

State of the Me: the Reading Slump of Stress edition

Hello, blog. It’s been a while, hasn’t it? I know I’d made a resolution this year to be more consistent with my blogging, and, well, we see where that got me.

The truth is, I’ve been in kind of a reading slump lately. Most of this is because RL is being full of drama and treachery and all-around unpleasantness, which have weighed on my mind quite a lot. But I’m trying to calm down and take things as they come and not panic.

Also, and this is a little weirdly OCD of me, but my favorite reading chair broke. It’s still under warranty, but they’re not going to be able to come fix it until February. Which means I have to find some other place to sit and read, and it’s just not the same!

I did, however, manage to finish a couple of books recently, and I’m hoping to revitalize my reading mojo by the simple expedient of needing something to do to procrastinate instead of doing my homework.

I plan on posting a couple of reviews in the next couple of days, and hopefully this will bring me back on track with my blogging goals.

Happy 2010!

Happy New Year!

I still haven’t gotten around to writing up any of the best-of lists for 2009 that I was planning, but since my resolution this year is to blog more, I figured I’d make a post anyway.

I spent New Year’s eve hanging out with friends, one of whom we picked up from the airport. As two of the three of us were blind, we decided it would be fun to visit one of the two theaters in the Kansas City metro area that offers descriptive video and see what was playing. Which meant we ended up flummoxing the poor theater staff who didn’t even know descriptive video was available. It also meant we missed about the first 20 minutes of Alvin and the Chipmunks: the Squeakuel. Somehow I had missed the fact that the chipmunks have made a comeback, and, in truth, that particular cultural phenomenon isn’t one I embrace with any kind of enthusiasm. My BFF’s 5-year-old, on the other hand, is an ardent fan of the Chipettes, the three girl chipmunks who, as it turns out, are quite besotted with the original chipmunk brothers.

I can tell you that I liked the movie–at least the part I sat through. I don’t think I would watch it over and over and over, but there were bits I loved. (Including, I must admit, a really nice moment between Theodore and Eleanor, the chipette of his dreams.) That being said, I continue to be gobsmacked by the idea of the chipmunks in high school. I really hope there will not be a third movie, featuring the chipmunks in college, possibly joining a loser fraternity which somehow needs to be saved from disbanding.

Anyway, after the movie, we spent the evening at a New Year’s party where several people we carol with were also in attendance. Instruments were produced, and a jam session broke out. It was a wonderful way to wring in the New Year.

Today, my friends and I hung around together, relaxing and enjoying each other’s company. We watched the Nanny Diaries , about which I find I have considerably less to say. It was entertaining, and I intend to read the book. I also ate my friend’s chicken curry salad, about which I would rhapsodize in great detail if I were any kind of food blogger. And now I’m home, hoping to curl up under my favorite quilt and finish a book which will become my first read of 2010.

I hope all of you were able to have a good time ringing in 2010. I look forward to finding out what the new year brings us!

A brief update

This week, instead of doing reviews the way I normally do, I plan to do a massive post highlighting briefly all the books I’ve read in the last couple of weeks of 2009, so that I can start afresh with reviews for the books I’ve read in 2010. And, since obviously the whole idea of actually telling y’all what I’ll be posting kind of petered out, I won’t even try.

That being said, everyone in the book blogosphere takes this time at the end of the year to reflect upon the books they’ve read, announce their favorites and set goals for the future. I’ll be doing some of that, over the course of the next few days. Hopefully, after the new year, I can get back to a steadier stream of reviews. Until then, keep checking back here for more awesomeness.

Virtual Advent Tour: Christmas Caroling

Today, I’m delighted to get a chance to participate in the 2009 Virtual Advent tour. Please check out the other participants in this great tour, as there are some excellent holiday posts up by some amazing bloggers. Here is my small contribution!

I don’t have many Christmas traditions that other people out there in the world don’t also have. Oh, there are my little private rituals–I like to listen to David Sedaris read “The Santaland Diaries” every year, for example, which probably says something fairly unflattering about me. But other than that? On Christmas Eve I go to my parents’ house, we go to bed early, wake up to open gifts, spend the day being lazy, and then it’s over.

The one thing I do, though, that I think is really special every year is participate in a caroling group. My friend Echo, a retired teacher I met through the blind community, which is small and quite interconnected, has been organizing the caroling trip every year for well over 30 years. Off and on for the past fifteen years, I’ve been in attendance, missing only a couple of years when I was living out of state. (I like to think of those as the Christmases from Hell, but that’s a completely different post.) The number and makeup of the caroling group have changed a lot over the past few years, but I love doing it every year, because there’s something about being in a room with people and singing your hearts out that, despite the logistical nightmares of setting the whole thing up, is extremely magical.

For me, that magic has coincided with several milestones in my life. Firstly, if it hadn’t been for caroling, I wouldn’t have met and become close friends with Echo and her partner. They are both wonderful women who have taught me a lot, women whose grace and dignity I hope I can eventually possess in some small measure.

Secondly, it was at a caroling party that I first made out with my then-boyfriend. I won’t go into details or anything, because I don’t remember them, but I do remember feeling more deeply in love with him in those moments than I think I did the whole rest of the time we were together. In my more wistful moments, I sometimes daydream that someone else will show up at a caroling party, because a small part of me is convinced I will meet my soulmate while my voice joins with others in singing “Joy to the World” or “O Come, All Ye Faithful.” Of course, this is not likely to ever happen, because I’ve known most of the people I carol with for years, and I’m sure if they ever thought they should set me up with someone who might be my soulmate, they’d have done so before now and not in such a chaotic setting.

And there is chaos. It all starts the Friday night before caroling, when those of us who live inconveniently far away from Echo converge on her house. The evening is usually spent in making sure we all have sack lunches to take with us, catching up on news and gossip, and eventually, the night is capped off by a rehearsal for those among us who, unlike me, play instruments more complicated than a kazoo. Echo, like me, enjoys surrounding herself with beautiful music, and consequently she knows a lot of musicians, so our carols have some complicated arrangements. (We sing Peter, Paul and Mary’s “A’Soalin’”, which, when you listen to the version Peter, Paul and Mary sing seems deceptively simple. Well, it’s not.) The musicians vary from year to year. This year, we will have two guitarists and a ukulele player. One of the guitarists, a brilliant woman who, in her day job, teaches math, also plays fiddle, flute and mandolin. (I always like to bask in her presence, in hopes that some musical talent beyond a strong and mostly on-pitch singing voice will magically rub off on me. This has yet to happen.) We also usually have someone willing to play keyboard, usually one of our blind musicians who inherited the stereotypical ability people think all blind people have to play music by ear. (I do not have this gift, much to my own dismay. I suppose I should have paid more attention and been more enthusiastic about the piano lessons I was forced into as a child, but I didn’t. *Sigh*.)

After the instrumental rehearsal, we all fall into bed to wake up bright and early on Saturday. Echo traditionally makes a breakfast casserole, which is loaded with more cholesterol and artery-clogging agents than you can shake a stick at. It’s extremely popular, and I have to confess that I don’t like it. (It should also be noted that, while I am not embarrassed to relate that my first makeout session happened at caroling, I admit to not liking the breakfast casserole with a sense of shame. After all, it’s one of those immutable traditions that people enjoy, and, despite what people may or may not think about me, I don’t always like being a killjoy.)

After breakfast and mingling with other carolers who have begun to arrive, we begin a three-hour rehearsal period. This usually doesn’t end up going very smoothly because inevitably someone is late, someone needs directions to where we’re going, and people are focused on catching up with people they haven’t seen since last year’s trip. But we sing through the hard pieces, giving our instrumentalists a chance to practice once more, only with a larger group.

I should say something about our caroling materials. Echo and our other guitarist, a mom and writer by day named Woody, have put together a diverse collection of songs. We have everything from the old chestnuts, “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer”, “Jingle Bells”, “Up on the Housetop”, etc. to more religious fair–”O Come All Ye Faithful”, “Hark the Herald Angels Sing”, “Joy to the World”, etc. And then there are the other pieces, including the aforementioned “A-Soalin”, as well as “Light One Candle”, another Peter, Paul and Mary song. We also sing a version of “We Wish You a Merry Christmas” that was arranged by The Weavers, (another 60′s folk group), and a catchy African song called “A Ka Bway La”. (I’m fairly sure that is a phonetic spelling, since when I google that particular spelling in hopes of providing you a youtube link, I get nada.) The nontraditional carols are my favorites, because only at caroling do I get a chance to sing them. Also, as a folk music fan, I love that we’re doing our part to keep obscure songs in circulation.

The actual caroling part of the adventure is fairly standard. We usually hit at least one nursing home. Sometimes we sing for people in hospitals. We’ve sung for little kids, and we’ve sung for homebound friends who find it difficult to get out and join us. (Those types are my favorites because they are genuinely excited to have us sing for them, and are much more engaged with us. The home caroling also gives us a chance to call up people who live too far away to come so that we can sing for them. Thanks to the invention of cell phones, we’ve now found it possible to carol to more than one person at a time this way.)

After the singing, we all troop back to Echo’s house, where her long-suffering partner serves up vats full of chili. People usually bring snacks and side items to go with it, and it’s a grand potluck, which is a great way to cap off the day.

So that’s my holiday tradition, in far more detail than you ever wanted. What are some of yours? Do you have favorite Christmas carols, or odd Christmas songs you like that my caroling group should learn.

P.S. Here are youtube links to a few versions of the songs we sing.

And here’s my contribution to our caroling experience. For the love of my bandwidth, I’d appreciate if you’d right click on this file,k hit Save As, and open it on your own system rather than streaming it from mine.

Christmas Morning

This week on the blog and a challenge update

A couple of weeks ago, I decided that I really ought to post a schedule of posts every week, so you all would know what I’m reviewing. Of course, having decided to do that, I promptly forgot, so this week is going to be the trial run of this new feature.

Here’s what’s coming up this week on the blog.

Monday: I’ll be reviewing a childhood classic, Little House in the Big Woods by Laura Ingalls Wilder.
Tuesday: I’m sticking to the theme of Laura Ingalls Wilder by reviewing A Little House Sampler , a collection of essays and articles that Laura and her daughter Rose wrote over the years.
Wednesday: I’m changing it up entirely and reviewing Chelsea Cain’s Heartsick. It’s about female serial killers, and was highly recommended, so stop by then to learn what I thought.
Thursday: Having finished Heartsick I thought I ought to read about another fictional serial killer, the infamous Dr. Hannibal Lecter, so I’ll be reviewing Thomas Harris’s The Red Dragon. Which serial killer did I like better? Tune in and find out.
Friday: I’m hoping to have finished another anthology of Christmas related romance novellas, The Magical Christmas Cat. This is the only review I’m not entirely sure about, since it’s been kind of a slug so far.

Also this week, I’ll be writing a blog post for the 2009 Virtual Advent Blog Tour. That’ll go up on Wednesday as well, and you’ll get to learn about one of my Christmas traditions.

Challenge update: You knew there were going to be more challenges, right? Because I have no self-control whatsoever.

Here are the latest challenges that look like fun.

1. What’s in a Name 3: The idea is to read one book from each of the following categories.

  • A book with a food in the title: (I think I’m going for Like Water for Chocolate by Laura Esquivel.)

  • A book with a body of water in the title: (My pick is Red Seas Under Red Skies by Scott Lynch.)
  • A book with a title (queen, president) in the title: (I think I’ll go with The Sugar Queen by Sarah Addison Allen.)
  • A book with a plant in the title: (My pick is The Rose Bride by Nancy Holder.)
  • A book with a place name (city, country) in the title: (My pick: The Little Giant of Aberdene County by Tiffany Baker.)
  • A book with a music term in the title: (My pick: Song in the Silence by Elizabeth Kerner.)

2. The Colourful Reading Challenge: The idea is to read nine different books with nine different colors in the title. I really love challenges that allow for some creativity in eliminating books from the TBR pile. So here’s what I’ve come up with.

  • The Blue Notebook by James A Levine

  • Green Rider by Kristen Britton
  • The Empire of Black and Gold by Adrian Tchaikovsky
  • The Secret History of the Pink Carnation by Lauren Willig
  • Black Rabit Summer by Kevin Brooks
  • Crimson Kiss by Tricia Baker
  • Greywalker by Cat Richardson
  • Salt and Silver by Anna Katherine
  • The Winter Rose by Jennifer Donnelly

    For now, that’s it. I’m looking forward to participating in both these challenges!

Readathon Wrap-up

I forgot to do a post about the 2eadathon as a whole. I guess now is as good a time as any to do that.

Basically… I’m really glad I participated. I had a lot of fun reading other people’s tweets, and there are several new blogs I’ve added to my feed reader that I hope to visit soon.

I’m definitely going to participate more fully next April. Hopefully I can even do the whole 24 hours without the need for pesky things like sleep and without other plans. I also picked really good books, for the most part, although I think for next time I’m going to try and have more light fare, because most of what I read was seriously depressing.

Today, I’ve been writing papers. (Well, actually, I spent most of today putting off the writing of said papers, but they are written, so that’s good.) I’m going to try to write up reviews for the books I read yesterday so that there will be plenty of content while I am busy with RL this weekend.

I hope the rest of you had a relaxing post-Readathon Sunday!

My thoughts on an accessible ebook reader

Recently, it was announced that there will soon be a free, accessible e-reading device designed by Kurzweil Education, which already produces scanning and OCR software for the blind. Many of the blind people I speak to regularly on twitter are excited about the prospect, myself included. After all, I have written before about my feelings about providing accessible ebooks for those of us who want them.

I’m cautiously optimistic about this soon-to-be released ebook reader. I like that I can use it on my computer and on my mobile devices. I like that it will work with pdf and epub files, and mostly I like that it is free.

I do have a few concerns, however. According to the Publishers’ Weekly article I linked to earlier, people will be able to purchase ebooks from the e-reader’s affiliated store. But I hope that, if I want to take advantage of the programs already offered by Fictionwise or Books on Board, I will be able to do this and still have the software working. I also question the need for some of the features the PW article mentioned. Apparently, this ebook reader will read plays with different TTS voices for each of the roles. Aside from students, who is actually going to use this feature? Wouldn’t the coders’ times have been better spent making sure the device could, oh, I don’t know, read as many varieties of formats as possible rather than giving us silly features that we can honestly live without?

Also, the article states that this reader, which doesn’t have a name, will be useful for sighted as well as blind people. I wonder if this is true, and I also wonder who the larger number of downloaders will be.

So, in the end, I’m excited about the November release of this software. I don’t expect it to be the miracle that the blind have been waiting for, but it’s definitely a step in the right direction, and I hope that it will be as awesome as advertised.

Sunday State of the Me

It’s been another long time since I blogged. I’ve been feeling a bit out of touch with the blogging community, too, and so I’m figuring that the only way to remedy that fact is to start again.

So what’s gotten me so far behind? Mostly a combination of burnout and worries about what I want to do with my blog. I want to provide something unique, but I’m not really sure that I do, and I’m also not really sure that it matters anyway.

So I’m going to muddle along, possibly tweaking things like my review format, and see where it all gets me. I really appreciate any of you who’ve stuck around, and I hope to be providing more interesting content soon.

I’m also sorry that I didn’t have time to participate in Book Blogger Appreciation Week. I really love being a part of the book blogging community, and, even though I didn’t really participate, I did enjoy reading the BBAW posts that came across my feed reader.

I am looking forward to the fall Readathon, though. I intend to participate fully this time, though, being a slow reader, I’m not sure I can actually finish more than maybe one, possibly two, books in a 24-hour period. It’s from the 24-25 of October, and I’ve already got a few things picked out to read.

In the meantime, I have reviews to write which I’m hoping to get posted up this week. I know I always say that, but hey, good intentions count for something, don’t they?

An update

I’m back from my weekend of uncomfortable oral surgery. (As fun activities go, I think this one ranks slightly above bathing in battery acid.) I’m mostly not in pain anymore, and am trying to finish recovering. I go back to the oral surgeon’s office so they can remove my sutures on Thursday, and then, I hope never to see that man again.

A couple of bloggy links of interest, because you should all definitely check out other blogs than this one:

  • Dear Author has posted a FAQ about the text-to-speech issue for authors. I have written about this issue quite enough myself, but it’s still one that interests me, and, hey, at least the comments section didn’t make me want to tear out my hair. Much.

  • I reviewed Say goodbye by Lisa Gardner for TGTBTU. I’m going to try to be better about linking to my TGTBTU reviews over here, because if I can’t promote my own writing on my own blog, where can I? Anyway, make with the clicky and see what I thought of the book.
  • Speaking of books, I actually managed to finish several this weekend. I wasn’t good for very much besides reading after the surgery, and I tried to pick books that were fun. I know I’ll keep saying that I’ll get reviews written, so I won’t promise that this time and we’ll just hope for the best.

    • Luck in the Shadows by Lynn Flewelling: You know, I’m still struggling with my thoughts on this book. I didn’t really like the characters, and it’s pretty obvious that this is a debut work. But there was something about the writing style that kept me interested enough to probably read the second book in this duology.

    • The Madness of Lord Ian Mackenzie by Jennifer Ashley: There was a lot of buzz in romancelandia about this book. It deserved all the buzz it got, too. The hero is yummy and tortured, the heroine is surprisingly well-developed considering that the hero’s name is in the title, which seems to be a hallmark for poor characterization of the heroine. It just really worked for me, and I haven’t read a historical romance in a long time that I’ve been this satisfied with.
    • Four and Twenty Blackbirds by Cherie Priest: I’d heard really good things about Ms. Priest’s writing, and they were well-founded. I really like Southern Gothic stories, and this one definitely fits the mold, being very atmospheric. I also really liked the narrator’s voice and her snarkiness, and I want to read more from this author.
    • the Blessing Way by Tony Hillerman: You know, years and years ago, someone recommended Tony Hillerman to me as an author I’d like, and I do remember liking the previous book of his I read. This one, though? Not so much. Mostly I was bored, and there wasn’t nearly enough Joe Leaphorn in it.

    Right now, I’m nearly finished with Burning Alive by Shannon K Butcher. It’s one of those books where the cheesiness is part of its charm. The hero is over the top alpha, which isn’t normally my thing except, apparently, in paranormal romance. The heroine is… basically useless, but likeable enough most of the time. Sadly, having lived near the area in which the story is set, I keep getting yanked out of the writing every time the author gets a bit of Kansas geography wrong.

    Anyway, it’s good to be back online, and I’m still going through my bloglines to see what you all did in my absence. (A lot, apparently.)

Status report

So this past weekend I started reading Pride and Prejudice. I decided to read this book for two reasons:

  • You apparently can’t be considered a real fantasy reader unless you’ve read Lord of the Rings. You can’t be considered a romance reader until you’ve read Pride and Prejudice. And, well, Mr. Tolkien and I have since agreed that we don’t suit, and he’s agreed to let me read other books, so I thought Miss Austen might suit me better.

  • I’ve been dying to read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies ever since I heard of its existance, and I wanted to say I’d read the original before I started the one with lots more ultraviolent zombie madness.

I really liked the original P & P, and I think Elizabeth Bennet deserves her place among the most compelling literary characters of all time. I was also really surprised how *funny* Ms. Austen actually is. I loved the antics of the Bennets, and Lady Catherine De Bourgh was awesome in a man-you-just-love-to-hate-this-lady kind of way.

I’ve also got my eye on a few other books I want to dip into sooner rather than later.

  • The Etched City by K. J. Bishop: I blame Primavera for this one, since she raved about it over IM. I started reading it today, and I’m really intrigued by the setting, which seems to be partly post-apocalyptic, partly more standard fantasy. I like the idea of fantasy with guns, furthermore, and for some reason, I really like the fatalism of Raule, the female doctor we meet early on. *

  • Doppelganger by Marie Brennan: I happened to be, um, not as engrossed in my studies as I should have been and opened the ebook to take a glance at it. I was intrigued by the first few paragraphs, and am excited to learn more about Mirage and to hope she kicks as much ass as the opening lines promise.
  • tomorrow by Samantha Kane: Samantha Kane’s on my very small auto-buy list. She is the only author to consistently sell me on menage romances, but I have to admit, the blurb makes this story look so. incredibly. cheesy. All it takes, really, are two words: space pirates. Avast, maties, I’ll not be a lyin’ landlubber, because the very idea of space pirates makes me want to walk the plank. Or, y’know, shove someone out of an airlock. but it’s Samantha Kane, so I have already bought the book, and plan to devour it.

In less cheerful news, I made it official and gave up on the blade Itself by Joe Abercrombie. I was kind of sad about that, too, because had I finished the book when I first started reading it, I might have continued loving it. But I took a break from it, came back and realized that the only characters I didn’t actively dislike were the token female and her brother. the girl definitely deserved a better book, or at least a potential love interest that wasn’t such an asshat.

So what about you guys? What are you reading this week?

*I don’t know why the cynicism intrigues me in the Bishop book whereas it’s an active turnoff with Abercrombie. Maybe it’s that Raule seems to have enough of the optimist buried inside her that I don’t feel suicidally depressed reading her thoughts on the world, whereas Abercrombie’s characters are either resigned or, well, annoyingly self-absorbed.

Blogger professionalism

I read this post on Katiebabs’ blog yesterday, and have been trying to figure out what I want to say about this topic in general ever since.

for those of you who are clicky-phobic, Kate linked to a reviewer who was told she would no longer be allowed to post negative reviews on a site she reviewed for. Which, of course, caused the comments to explode in yet another old tired debate about mean grrls vs. nice girls on the Internet.

My opinion boils down to this. Reader bloggers are not professional reviewers. It’s nice if we act like professionals when we review, but ultimately our blogs are our own spaces and we don’t actually owe anyone anything. Free Internet and all that. Sure, good manners dictate that possibly saying, “I would rather stare at the contents of my cat’s litter box than ever read anything this untalented, clap-infested whore writes because she obviously got her publishing contract by blowing her editor” might not be the best way to approach a negative review, but, well, it’s not like there aren’t several very successful bloggers who manage to be snarky and fairly well-respected in the book-blogging world.

I, personally, don’t think my online voice is terribly snarky. I’m much better at snark in one-on-one situations with friends, and I do try to be professional when I review a book I didn’t like. This is because I am such a small potato in the book blogging world that every time an author notices one of my reviews, I get all tingly inside, and, since I hate confrontation, I try to be as classy as I can be when I post negative reviews. I don’t know if I succeed even some of the time, but I do try. I also believe in being honest, which has involved giving a few books the dreaded D and F grades. If that bothers people so much, then it’s not like there’s any great loss by them not sending their books to me, right?

Also, I think there’s a difference between snark and outright cruelty. Like, I don’t think I could ever liveblog a book on Twitter, though I have been sorely tempted a time or two. I also think personally attacking an author, speculating on her physical attributes, sexual orientation, or level of education, or calling for books to be burned crosses that line. But I still maintain that sometimes you just gotta say, “This book sucks big hairy donkey balls”.

Another important thing to remember is this: I write reviews for other readers. There is nothing more thrilling for me than turning someone whose reading tastes are similar to mine onto a book I think they’ll love. I mean, think of it. If they love the book, too, we can squee about it endlessly. But my reviews aren’t meant for the edification of the authors of the books I read. I figure that, if an author really wants constructive feedback on the writing process, that’s why she has an agent and/or an editor. By the time the book gets past both of those people and hits my computer, there’s not really anything further I can do to aid the writing process, and I don’t believe I should have to.

Ultimately, though, my blog is not a democracy, and neither is anyone else’s. I do what works for me and I assume other people do, too. That’s the great thing about the book blogging community. There are so many diverse voices, and I really think there’s room for everybody from the uber-snarky to the sweet and cheerful people who have never met a book they didn’t love to those of us somewhere in the middle. And, quite frankly, I wouldn’t have it any other way,.

A Rose by Any Other Name

Here’s a question for all of you who write book reviews. How do you address a book’s author?

While I have made friends with a few authors online, (Hi, Bree and Donna! Hi, Kirsten! Hi, LB!) I firmly believe there should be a little bit of a disconnect between an author and readers. I don’t write reviews for the authors whose books I read. I write them because I hope someone somewhere shares my taste in books and will find them helpful.

To that end, if I write about an author in my posts, I tend to refer to them in formal terms. (Ms. Rogers, Ms. Saell, Ms. Gregg.) I guess it seems a little more professional to do that, and gives a slight vineer of increased objectivity. But maybe that’s in my head. I know of several reviewers who are perfectly comfortable with first-naming the authors whose books they review, and hey, it works for them. I’m just not comfortable with it.

So what about the rest of you? Do you first-name the authors of the books you review, or do you address them formally? Have you ever thought about why you choose the form of address that you do for authors? Authors, what’s your preference?

Monday night ramblings

When it rains it pours. When I have inspiration for stuff to blog about, I could post multiple times a day. When I don’t, well, you get posts like this.

I’ve really done a lot of reading lately. Today, in addition to homework reading, I finished Anne of Green Gables , which is one of those books I really should have read growing up. I’ve been on kind of a YA kick lately, since before that I’d read the awesome Looking for Alaska by John Green. I’ll try and get both of those reviewed.

Now, though, I’ve settled in with Larissa Ione’s amazingly addictive Desire Unchained , the second in her Demonica series. I love this series, since I love meaty paranormal romance, and this one fits the bill quite nicely with, so far, no completely silly female characters. I have a ton of romances I need to read, and lately I haven’t felt all that interested, so I’m grateful to Ms. Ione for bringing me out of my romance reading slump.

I’ve also spent an inordinate amount of time blogsurfing this weekend. I have added a ton of new feeds to my bloglines because of the readathon, and one of these days I will update my links to reflect that. I’m even trying to be better about showing people my love via comments, which I’ve always sucked at. Which brings me to an issue.

One of my favorite reader blogs ever is Marg’s blog. She reads such an interesting variety of books, and I always look to her for recommendations and interesting challenge opportunities. She also comments a lot over here. But alas, I cannot reciprocate, for she has turned off anonymous commenting, and blogger doesn’t believe that I have an open ID using this blog URL. Other blogs offer the option of entering my name and the blog URL, but Marg’s doesn’t, which makes me sad since there have been several times I’ve wanted to leave her comments and couldn’t. I actually sent her an email about this, but figured the spam monsters got it, so here I am, begging for the name/URL option on her blog, so I can leave comments. Please? With sugar on top? I would be ever so grateful!

And on that note, I’m off to bed. Hopefully, there will be more substantive posts and less Shannon running off at the keyboard in the future.

Sunday rambling inconsequential blog post

Happy Sunday!

It’s finally getting to be vaguely springlike in my part of the U.S., which is exciting because I can have the window open in my bedroom and actually get some fresh air. Plus I can go outside and enjoy the weather without having to wear layers!

Anyway, I hope those of you who participated in the 24 hour readathon met your reading goals. I realized after keeping up with some bloggers who participated that I basically had no excuse at all for not playing, In fact, I didn’t crack a book at all yesterday, mostly because I don’t know what I want to read. But in October, I will be there. With bells on.

As for today, well, hopefully I can settle on a book soon. After, of course, I satisfy my craving for a sweet roll and get caffeine into my bloodstream.

I hope everyone else is having a relaxing–or at least marginally less chaotic than usual–Sunday!

Book Confessions

I’m not proud of any of these, but I figured I would throw them out here in hopes I’m not alone.

1. I absofreakinglutely hated the one book by Laurie Halse Anderson that I tried to read, that being Speak. I am apparently the only reader in the history of people who read YA fiction for whom this is true. I certainly know Liviania has politely informed me that I should stop with my crack smoking.

2. I have no interest whatsoever in reading the Wheel of Time series. The one time I tried to read something by Jordan I found the writing style annoying.

3. I would much rather not notice an author’s prose style. Serviceable, workmanlike prose will generally get the story told without me feeling like the author is smirking smugly thinking to himself, “I freaking rock at coming up with original turns of phrase, don’t I?” Not that I don’t appreciate lush prose, because I absolutely do, I just want the story more.

4. Sometimes I do skim through my romance ebooks looking for the smut when I’m in a particular mood. I know that’s so terribly stereotypical, but I also know I’m not the only reader who does this.

5. Sometimes I consider reading books just because I have to know if they’re going to be as bad as they’re made out to be. The only reason I have yet to buy touched by Venom by Janine Cross is that it’s not available via fictionwise. I mean, we’re talking about the infamous venom cock book here. I have also considered reading the gor series for similar reasons. Thankfully, in the first case, the book appears to be the kind of dark fantasy where everyone suffers and is miserable the whole entire time because people suck, and in the second case, well, my inner feminist is nobody’s slave girl. But I can’t deny the temptation to check out the crack is there.

So those are my book confessions. What are yours?

This and that

Things that Are Good: Yesterday, I went to Fictionwise, and I bought books. I have the latest books from Ann Aguirre, Jean Johnson and Carrie Ryan. I haven’t started any of these books, but rest assured, they will not languish on my TBR for long.

I’m also doing really well with picking good books this week. I finished Caressed by Ice by Nalini Singh earlier this week, and now am reading Say Goodbye by Lisa Gardener, on the recommendation of Wendy the Super Librarian. Though, should you decide to go find that book yourself on Amazon, keep in mind even Wendy, who is a suspense junkie, thought the book was creepy. She is not wrong.

The Bad: I have class work out the yin-yang to accomplish this weekend. Tomorrow I’m going to go with a friend to view some art, which is one of those pointless activities if you’re blind but which will net me some extra credit. Then on Saturday I’m helping out at our local AIDS walk, which requires being up at an hour of the day I used to believe did not exist. Which means Sunday and Monday will be spent in homework.

On the Internet, there is a lovely rant over at Dear Author about the author’s Guild’s completely fucked-up position regarding text to speech. Maili said everything I would have said, except with less bitchy defensiveness. The thing is, I really do wish actual blind people’s voices were being heard in these discussions. I joked with a friend that Dear Author must have missed my presence because of the fact that an entry like that is guaranteed to elicit at least one comment from me. I think it’s telling that the best and most cogent explanation for why the blind that, well, live inside my particular head are so upset about this issue comes from someone who is presumably not herself blind. I’m not exactly sure what that says about blind people and Internet discourse, but I’m not sure it’s a good thing.

Speaking of Internet discourse, though, I’m excited! I have added several new blogs to my RSS reader after the comments to my Booking through Thursday post. I may rarely post comments elseblog, but I lurk plenty and it’s always nice to find other people to read.

Why I’m not saving contemporary romance

This is why I do not have my finger on the pulse of the romance genre.

I know that Lisa Kleypas is one of the best romance authors out there. But after reading Ana’s review of her latest book, Smooth Talking Stranger, I could only sit there and roll my eyes. A lot.

I know there’s been a lot of talk, particularly on Dear Author and Smart Bitches about saving the contemporary romance. But I have to be honest and admit that the one genre of romance that is less likely to work for me than anything else is contemporary romance.

Essentially, when I read contemporary fiction, I want the characters to be people I could meet and hang out with in real life. I need some way to relate to the characters, and with very few exceptions, I can’t say that I do. Even contemporary romance authors I like, such as Janice Kay Johnson, sometimes misstep. One of the things that brought my grade down after reading the delightful Snowbound was the fact that the heroine, who was my age, didn’t think like any woman in her mid to late twenties I’d ever met. She was just a bit too prudish, and it really bothered me that not even in her head did she use any four-letter words. I mean, I get that not everybody has a potty mouth the way I do, but sheesh. It’s not like “damn” is such a shocking word.

The other issue that trips me up in contemporaries is that I often don’t agree with the politics of the writers. The thing that really made me decide to skip this offering from even a maven of romance like Lisa Kleypas was a phrase that has been known to strike terror into the hearts of… at least me. “feminist heroine.” It’s my experience that feminist heroines in romances, no matter the genre, are the sorts of women who like to stomp around and scream about the evils of men with the same ardor my three-year-old niece displays in dismissing some food she hates. These women are usually silenced by the application of the hero’s penis to some receptive hole, so one gets a sense their principles weren’t strong to begin with. I’m at least grateful that the Kleypas heroine is feminist and, at the start of the book, in a relationship with someone else, but we all know where that’s going, because her soon to be ex is a Vegan. Because nothing quite says limp-dicked wussy boy like a desire not to consume dairy, eggs or meat, apparently. And I just know that the real hero, a millionaire playboy, votes Republican. I seriously cannot think of anything I’ve read where the hero espoused any kind of liberal politics, unless we’re talking about contemporary M/M romance, which is somewhat different. No, liberal women are generally misguided, and liberal men are weenies. (To be fair, Practice Makes Perfect by Julie James subverts this, and quite well, because her heroine is a strong feminist at the beginning and at the end, despite being with the very conservative hero, but I don’t seem to hear about cases where this particular trope is ever subverted very often.)

But all that’s fairly minor. Mostly, I’m just not interested in the genre as a whole. I don’t want to read about modern cowboys. I don’t have any interest in multigazillionaires. I don’t want to know about what sort of utterly useless job the heroines have. I’m also pretty sure I could be wowed by a decent contemporary romance. (I have books by Jennifer Crusie and Robyn Carr on my TBR pile and will get to both of them one of these days, after all.) But mostly, they just don’t interest me, and that, more than my annoyance at a tendency toward strawman characterizations of positions I feel strongly about in real life, is what will keep me away. I’ll leave the rest of you to keep the contemporary from dying whatever ignominious death is being threatened. Leave me alone with my historicals and paranormals.

P.S. Lest the Lisa Kleypas fangirls attack me in droves, I’m sure Smooth Talking Stranger is a great book and you will love it. It just happens to handily illustrate the points that drive me crazy.

Blogging and reading tidbits

I spent last night organizing all my RSS feeds into folders. I have my romance folder, my fantasy and SF folder, my politics and feminism folder, my general books folder, and my Culture and Sociology folder, which is where, apparently, blogs that don’t fit into those other categories go. Since I’m subscribed to something like 90 feeds, I’m hoping this will make life easier on me.

Reading-wise, I’m about two thirds of the way through Through Wolf’s Eyes by Jane Lindskold. Apparently, I was in the mood for lighter fantasy, and this book is doing the job quite nicely. I would totally glom the rest of Lindskold’s work except that the number of books I’ve started and then put down to save for a better mood is astronomically high, and I should really weed down my TBR mountain at some point.

I really don’t know how people who read one genre or type of book exclusively do it. Me, I just can’t. Because sometimes I’m not really in the mood for swords and sorcery. Sometimes I want something dark and spine-chilling. Sometimes I want smut. I can’t always get everything I ever want in one book, and I don’t think I’d want to if I could. So I read omnivorously, and it seems to work out for me, because invariably there’s something in my TBR pile to suit whatever mood I’m in.

What about the rest of you? Do you read pretty much in one genre in favor of others, or do you spread it out?

Reason 12345 why I am a dork

I haven’t owned a television in my entire adult life. I have lived in apartments where televisions also happened to be, but for myself, I’ve never seen the need, because I’m addicted to the Internet, which is a differently completely passive activity. Anyway, I’m mostly OK with this lack of TV, because I still absorb important pop culture through interacting with the rest of the human race.

Which is why, last night, I found myself embracing the latest kitchy thing to take America by storm. Oh, I’d heard about it. I mean, how could I follow Katiebabs on Twitter without knowing about this?

I am, of course, referring to the snuggie. Katiebabs recently blogged about the snuggie, and my reaction was a mildly amused “…OK?”

Then I actually watched the commercial. And a strange thing happened. For a brief moment, I found myself thinking, “Oh! My! God! It’s a blanket! With sleeves! I must have one!” I don’t even particularly care that one commenter on a blog somewhere described them as fugly choir robes. It’s a blanket! With sleeves! What’s not to love about that? Never mind the fact that the Snuggie is made in China, probably with sweatshop labor from people who, in their entire life, couldn’t make enough to *buy* a snuggie. Never mind the fact that it is almost April, and therefore too warm to even be thinking about buying a blanket. The utter cheese of this commercial makes me want to own one.

Well, I suppose, better the snuggie than the Shamwow!

So does anyone out there in bloglandia own a snuggie? Come on, you can admit to it! Meanwhile, I will be huddled, cold and without a blanket with sleeves, under my rock.

P.S. I intensely love this parody commercial.

Dignity


Someone showed me a picture and I just laughed
Dignity never been photographed
I went into the red, I went into the black
Into the valley of dry bone dreams

So many roads, so much at stake
So many dead ends, I’m at the edge of the lake
Sometimes I wonder what it’s gonna take
To find dignity.

--"Dignity" as sung by Solas

I’ve been thinking a lot about dignity lately, especially as it relates to my disability. More specifically, I find myself depressed at how quickly people can just casually shred a person’s dignity without realizing they’re doing it.

I can’t tell you how many times people have come up to me, in the course of my life, and told me that I was brave for simply doing what they do on a normal basis, whether it’s taking a bus to my college, walking to class by myself, or even standing in line at a coffee shop. I know that my reaction to such people ought to be a charitable one. I should consider that I have been blind all my life, and maybe if I woke up with the loss of one of my other senses leaving the house, dressing myself in the morning, or otherwise interacting with the world would be difficult. I tell myself that, and yet I still resent it when people give me the, “You’re so brave!” speech, because statements like that reduce my actual accomplishments. I am never told I am brave for getting an A on a test or blogging regularly or doing volunteer work, which I think are by far better accomplishments than merely showing up wherever I happen to be going every day. I know that statements like, “You’re so brave!” or, even better, “You’re such an inspiration!” say more about the people making them than they do about me, but it still reduces me from a person to the object of a life lesson, and I’m not that, either.

Then there are the people that offer me help. Sometimes, I’ll grant you, I need help. I’m not comfortable setting out on my own down the isles of Wal-Mart with a specific shopping list in mind, for example. But I’m fairly certain that, after two years of walking through the same doors to the building the bus drops me off in front of at the school, I will not suddenly forget how to do that. And invariably, someone always ostentatiously offers to help, usually by trying to grab my arm and tug me in the right direction or by loudly exclaiming, “I’ve got the door!” as if by opening the door, they have accomplished something wonderful and deserve my grattitude, because certainly opening the door is something I, with two working arms, couldn’t possibly do all by myself. Often, I just want to snap at these people and actually say, “Y’know, I was *fine*. I don’t need the help. STFU and go away.” But I’m a polite Midwestern girl, and after having been told one too many times about how my behavior will paint every blind person with the same brush for those good samaritans I meet in public, I generally just grit my teeth and mutter a “Thank you” and try to move on, ignoring as best I can that I have managed to make someone’s day that little bit brighter at the expense of my own self-worth. After all, the person who ostentatiously held the door open for me can now go home and tell her family, “I had to help a poor blind girl today.”

This is not to mention all of the ways in which, just working within the system, my dignity is stripped away. For example, in order to avail myself of the paratransit service I have to use because I live in a town that does not have excellent bus service, I am encouraged to sell myself short and paint my disability in the worst light possible. I don’t own a scanner, and so someone has to read my mail to me, thus robbing me of my right to privacy. I know a girl who lives alone and needed a bit of help with cleaning and running errands and the like. She practically had to admit to not being able to dress herself just so she could get someone to come perform those services for her. I have come to the conclusion that I am not desperate enough for that kind of service to ask for it, but if I didn’t have the support system that I do, that would be my situation, too, and there’s nothing worse for a person raised with good old, can-do Midwestern values, than feeling like she has to grovel in order to ensure that she has a decent quality of life.

I don’t write all of this to make anyone feel sorry for me or put anyone on the defensive. I don’t require pity–at least, not about this. I just think able-bodied people need to think about this sort of thing more often than they do. For the record, the proper response, at least for me, to a disabled person wandering around that you think might need help is to simply ask if help is required. If the answer is no, move on. That leaves the disabled person with dignity intact and you can still feel good that you made the offer.